Product of the U.S.A. -- Not!!

The Misleading Labeling of Grass-Fed Beef

The labeling of grass-fed beef is concern for many producers and consumers in the United States. A significant portion of the beef labeled as "Product of U.S.A." is imported from overseas. This misrepresentation is allowed due to a current labeling policy by the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). The need for clear, common-sense food labeling is evident to safeguard consumer interests and provide support to local grass-fed and grass-finished beef producers.  (Yes, this might be a little self-serving. It’s also a bunch of B.S. too.)

-- READ MORE -- ​

---

When consumers choose grass-fed beef in their grocery store or butcher shop, they do so with the expectation of enjoying its health benefits while also supporting domestic ranchers. However, it is unfortunate that this expectation is often not met. The USDA's Food Safety and Inspection Services Agency permits the use of the "Product of U.S.A." label if the meat has passed through a U.S.-based inspection plant or has been blended with meat from animals born and raised in the U.S.  Seems kind of cheap and wrong, eh?

To address this labeling loophole, Senators Mike Rounds and John Thune have introduced the U.S. Beef Integrity Act. This proposed legislation aims to rectify the sometimes-misleading labeling practices and ensure that consumers can make informed choices. We won't hold our breath for anything out of Washington.  While waiting for unlikely bureaucratic solutions, one way for consumers to avoid falling victim to "Product of U.S.A." labeling deception is to purchase directly from grass-fed producers.

Grass-fed beef is not only favored for its health benefits but also because it promotes animal welfare and has a positive impact on the environment. In contrast, beef from industrial factory farm feedlots carries a substantial carbon footprint. The combined emissions of the top five beef companies are equivalent to those of ExxonMobil. Sustainable grass-fed beef production, done right, can serve as a partial climate solution. There are numerous resources that provide insights into the environmental benefits of well-managed grass-fed practices, including previous regenerative farming and adaptive pasture management blogs posts at The North Coast Ranch.
​

Northern Michigan Pasture

Choosing grass-fed beef, regardless of its origin, remains a preferable choice over factory-farmed feedlot beef. Living near a beef feedlot and slaughterhouse/processing facility can be a health risk as it exposes individuals to polluted water, contaminated air and various harmful substances. Nobody wants to endure the foul odors and toxic gases present in the vicinity of feedlots. These locations also emit floating particles of fecal matter, feed materials, skin cells and byproducts of microbial degradation, which can be inhaled and cause health issues. Therefore, even when locally produced, grass-fed beef from anywhere in the world is a better option.

Brazil is one of the largest beef exporters in the world and 90% of Brazilian beef is grass-fed.  Sounds good, right? Some caution should be used when purchasing imported grass-fed beef from Brazil. While its beef may be grass-fed, Brazil’s beef production is a leading cause of deforestation. The importation of falsely labeled beef marketed as "Product of U.S.A." not only fails to support American farmers but also contributes to the deforestation.

Red clover

Consumers are advised to be vigilant and pay close attention to where their “Product of the U.S.A” beef is sourced and how it was raised and processed. By raising awareness and demanding accountability, consumers can help ensure that the grass-fed beef they purchase truly aligns with their values; whether it is supporting local farmers, prioritizing farm fresh products, concern for animal welfare or the environmental impact of their purchases.

Closing the "Product of U.S.A." labeling loophole is important. It’s not a life-or-death situation, but important, nonetheless. Transparency and accountability in the grass-fed beef market are needed to provide clarity and increase consumer confidence. It is only through policy changes and common-sense regulations that consumers can trust that grass-fed labeling is accurate.  An easier solution to “fighting City Hall” is simply to support local producers that make it easier to make informed decisions.

Whattya think?  Any thoughts, comments or observations?  Let us know in the comments or contact us.

​

---